IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 28, 2013
HENRY A. JONES,
SAHOTA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 22, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein (ECF No. 127) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On February 26, 2013, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations, dismissed this action, and judgment was entered.
Thereafter, on March 11, 2013, Plaintiff requested reconsideration of
the findings and recommendations, in light of his objections thereto,
which he claims to have timely mailed to the Court. Although the Court
did not receive those objections, Plaintiff submits them as an exhibit
to his request for reconsideration. (ECF No. 133 Ex. A). In an
abundance of caution, the Court will grant Plaintiff's request to
consider his objections. Accordingly, the February 26, 2013 Order
adopting the findings and recommendations is hereby reconsidered in
light of the Plaintiff's recently submitted objections.*fn1
However, nothing presented in Plaintiff's objections warrants
vacating the judgment in this case.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case, including Plaintiff's objections to the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court again finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order entered on February 26, 2013 (ECF No. 130) adopting in full the findings and recommendations and granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment filed is CONFIRMED.