UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
March 29, 2013
IN RE: HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP JOHN KEKER - # 49092 firstname.lastname@example.org DANIEL PURCELL - # 191424 email@example.com EUGENE M. PAIGE - # 202849 firstname.lastname@example.org 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 Attorneys for Defendant LUCASFILM LTD.
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh Date Consol. Amended Compl. Filed: September 13, 2011 Trial Date: November 12, 2013
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION
Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7-11 and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order allowing Defendants to file a Statement of Recent Decision. 3 WHEREAS Defendants wish to file a Statement of Recent Decision in order to bring the 4 recent Ninth Circuit decision Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc. to the Court's attention.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs do not stipulate that the Wang decision is relevant, Plaintiffs also do 6 not oppose the filing of Defendants' Statement of Recent Decision. 7 Therefore, subject to the approval of this Court, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate 8 and agree to the filing of Defendants' Statement of Recent Decision.
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in 9 the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories. 10 11 12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.