Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Ryan Mcgowan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 29, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
RYAN MCGOWAN, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Edmund F. Brennan U.S. Magistrate Judge

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney WILLIAM S. WONG MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant United States Attorneys 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DISCOVERY HEARING AS TO DEFENDANT EARLY AND EXCLUDING TIME DATE: April 9, 2013 TIME: 2:00 p.m. Ctrm:

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

This matter came before the Court for a status conference on January 8, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. At the parties' request, the Court set briefing and motions schedule for discovery, including a status conference and hearing which was heard on March 12, 2013. Defendant Early filed a motion for discovery pursuant to that schedule. No other defendants filed discovery motions. The Court referred defendant Early's matter to the duty magistrate for hearing.

The government and Donald Kilmer, counsel for Mr. Early, are continuing to resolve informally as many discovery issues as possible prior to hearing on the discovery motion. The government needs additional time to research and write its response, to meet and confer regarding discovery, and to allow defense inspection of government exhibits. Therefore, the parties request that the discovery motion hearing continue to be heard on April 9, 2013; that the government's opposition filing date be changed from March 26, 2013 to March 28, 2013; and that the defendant's reply be due on April 2, 2013.

The parties further agree that the court's previous order setting a law and motion hearing for April 9, 2013, and excluding time up to that date should remain in effect.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

20130329

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.