Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Richard D. Davis, Iii v. Folsom Cordova Unified School District

March 30, 2013

RICHARD D. DAVIS, III, PLAINTIFF,
v.
FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On January 23, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, which the court has carefully reviewed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2013 (Doc. No. 57) are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' May 17, 2012 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 47) is granted;

3. Plaintiff's April 27, 2012 second amended complaint (Doc. No. 44) is dismissed without leave to amend; and

4. This action is closed.

20130330

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.