IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 2, 2013
LLOYD F. BENSON, III, PLAINTIFF,
CITIBANK, N.A., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jacqueline Scott Corley United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
On March 25, 2013, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 35). (Dkt. No. 41.) Plaintiff has filed a response to the order to show cause and a belated opposition to Defendants' motion. (Dkt. Nos. 44 & 45.)
Defendants' reply, if any, to Plaintiff's opposition is now due April
9, 2013. The
hearing on defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the Case Management
Conference are reset for
April 18, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave. San
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.