Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re Subpoenas Issued To Impax Laboratories, Inc. Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Apotex Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


April 3, 2013

IN RE SUBPOENAS ISSUED TO IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. MEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
PLAINTIFF,
v.
APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., PERRIGO ISRAEL PHARMACEUTICAL LTD., PERRIGO COMPANY, AND L. PERRIGO COMPANY DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley

[Proposed] ORDER FOR RELEASE OF Relating to Litigation Pending in the United SEALED COURT TRANSCRIPT OF States District of New Jersey, MARCH 28, 2013 HEARING (JAP)(TJB) (D. N.J): REGARDING MEDA PHARMACEUTICALS INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND TESTIMONY FROM IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.

The Motion to Compel Document Production and Testimony from Impax Laboratories,

Inc. ("Impax") by plaintiff Meda Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Meda") came on regularly before this Court for hearing on March 28, 2013. Carl Anderson and Krista Rycroft of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP appeared on behalf of Meda, and William Rakoczy and Alice Riechers of Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP and Gordon Endow of Gordon & Rees LLP appeared on behalf of Impax.

Whereas, both Meda and Impax filed motions to seal in connection with Meda's motion to compel, which motions the Court granted on March 13, 2013 (D.I. 28 and 27, respectively);

Whereas, information which was the subject of the motions to seal was referred to extensively at the March 28, 2013 hearing;

Whereas, no persons were present at the March 28, 2013 hearing concerning the motion to compel other than counsel listed above;

Whereas, the entire transcript of the March 28, 2013 hearing was ordered sealed;

Whereas, the Court has taken the matter under submission (D.I. 33); and

Whereas, Meda is requesting a copy of the transcript for possible further use in this matter.

After consideration of the forgoing, and for good cause appearing therefor:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the transcript of the March 28, 2013 hearing on Meda's motion to compel in this action be released to counsel for Meda upon payment therefor.

20130403

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.