Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James M. Lanier v. Fresno Unified School District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 5, 2013

JAMES M. LANIER,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Barbara A. McAuliffe United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER; MODIFYING BRIEFING ) SCHEDULE

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On March 13, 2013, Defendant filed a motion to amend its answer, setting the motion to be heard on April 12, 2013. (Doc. 83.) On April 2, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for a ten-day extension of time to file his opposition. (Doc. 88.) Plaintiff states his wife recently has undergone full knee replacement surgery, and Plaintiff is solely responsible for her in-home aftercare. Id.

Having reviewed Plaintiff's motion, and for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS the following:

1. The hearing on Defendant's motion to amend its answer, currently set for April 12, 2013, is CONTINUED to May 3, 2013, at 9:30 AM, in Courtroom 8, before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe;

2. Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before April 19, 2013;

3. Defendant shall file its reply on or before April 26, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130405

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.