UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 8, 2013
LAURA A EDWARDS, PLAINTIFF,
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 22
United States District Court Northern District of California
Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 22.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court 15 finds that the parties' briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for 16 disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for April 18, 2013, is hereby VACATED.
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should reflect the date or dates on which the parties are available for the hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.