Sharon Noelle Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 19

United States District Court Northern District of California

Before the Court is Wells Fargo's Amended Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 19. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 15 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties' briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the 16 matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently 17 scheduled for April 11, 2013, is hereby VACATED. 18

However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, the Court will reschedule the hearing at a 21 time that is convenient to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Any such notice should 22 reflect the date or dates on which the parties are available for the hearing. 23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130408