IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 8, 2013
GORDON H. FLATTUM, PLAINTIFF,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 9, 2012, the district court adopted this court findings and recommendations which recommended denying defendant's motion to dismiss without prejudice and staying this action until the administrative proceedings in state court are concluded. Plaintiff has now filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint which indicates that the administrative proceedings are concluded. Defendants have not filed an opposition to the motion.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. This action is no longer stayed.
2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, filed February 25, 2013, (dkt. no. 24), is granted.
3. Defendants shall file a response to the second amended complaint within twenty-eight (28) days of this order.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.