Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Marc Opperman, et al v. Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 9, 2013

MARC OPPERMAN, ET AL.,
v.
PLAINTIFFS, PATH, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE REGARDING JUDICIAL REFERRAL TO DETERMINE WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED Re: Dkt. No. 306

On April 8, 2013, Judge Gonzalez Rogers, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), referred Hernandez v. Path, Inc., No. 12-CV-01515-YGR, and Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., 12-CV-01529-YGR, 15 to this Court to consider whether those two actions, which are related to each other, are related to 16 the above-captioned action, Opperman v. Path, Inc., No. 13-CV-00453.

Any party wishing to file a statement in support of or opposition to the underlying motion to relate, Hernandez, ECF No. 52, shall file (and serve on all parties in each of the three actions) 19 its statement by no later than Tuesday, April 16, 2013, after which the Court will take the matter 20 under submission.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130409

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.