UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 9, 2013
RAUL SANCHEZ ZAVALA ,
HECTOR RIOS, ET AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael J. Seng United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND (ECF No. 58) AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Plaintiff Raul Sanchez Zavala ("Plaintiff") is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment Complaint filed June 17, 2012, against Defendant Gonzaga and various Doe Defendants. (ECF No. 34) The Fifth Amended Complaint alleges causes of action arising under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. (Id.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages. (Id.)
On February 14, 2013, the Court consolidated another one of Plaintiff's actions (1:12-cv-00930 (PC) Zavala v. United States) with this action. (ECF No. 55.) In its order, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a motion to amend and a proposed sixth amended complaint. (Id.) Plaintiff's former counsel filed a motion to amend on February 22, 2013. (ECF No. 58.) Defendant Gonzaga has filed a statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 63.)
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that leave to amend shall be freely given. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2).
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to amend is GRANTED. Within thirty (30) days of service of this order, Plaintiff should file a new amended complaint that should be clearly and boldly titled "Sixth Amended Complaint," refer to the appropriate case number, and be an original signed under penalty of perjury. The Court will screen this pleading and order additional service if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.