Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kelly Crowe v. Rama Gogineni

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 10, 2013

KELLY CROWE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAMA GOGINENI, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On December 12, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2012 (Doc. No. 67) are adopted in full;

2. Defendant BHB's June 7, 2012 motion to strike (Doc. No. 32) is granted and defendant BHB is dismissed from this action;

3. Defendant Gogineni's May 10, 2012 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is denied;

4. Defendant Gogineni's May 3, 2012 motion for order setting security (Doc. No. 13) is denied; and

5. Defendant Gogineni is ordered to respond to the complaint within thirty days of the date this order is filed and served.

20130410

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.