UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 10, 2013
THOMAS WILLIAM ABNEY,
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF Nos. 1 & 12.) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Thomas William Abney ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 21, 2013, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff's complaint, with leave to amend, for failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff was given thirty days to amend his complaint and was cautioned that the failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action, with prejudice. More than thirty days has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.
Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action BE DISMISSED, with prejudice, based on Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted.
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.