Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ken Waterhouse, Sherwood Mhp LLC v. City of Lancaster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 18, 2013

KEN WATERHOUSE, SHERWOOD MHP LLC,
AND WATERHOUSE MANAGEMENT CORP.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF LANCASTER, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Judge Otero

Pretrial Conference: Date: May 30, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m. Court Room 1, 2nd Floor RULE 54 JUDGMENT OF DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

[PROPOSED] PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER, Case No. 2:12-CV-00923-SJO

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, and based on the Plaintiffs' Notice of Acceptance of Rule 68 Offer of Settlement by Defendant (Dkt. 106, 106-1, and 106-2), judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs Ken Waterhouse, Sherwood MHP LLC, and Waterhouse Management Corporation and against defendant the City of Lancaster as follows:

1. The Court hereby declares that: The City of Lancaster municipal Ordinance No. 952, entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lancaster, California Approving the Addition of a Senior Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone (MHP-S) on the Lancaster Zoning Map at Three Existing Mobilehome Park Locations," does not apply to, and shall not be enforced against, Sherwood Mobile Home Park, located at 3753 E. Avenue I, Lancaster, California. A true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 952 is attached to this Judgment as Exhibit 'A.'

2. Plaintiffs, Ken Waterhouse, Sherwood MHP LLC, and Waterhouse Management Corporation, are the prevailing parties in this litigation. Plaintiffs may bring a motion for an award of attorneys' fees and costs under Title 42, United States Code, Section 3613 (c) (2).

3. The Parties have agreed to a settlement of Plaintiffs' damage claims. (See Dkt. 106.)

IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________

S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

William Litvak, Esq., Attorney for Defendant. David Spangenberg, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiffs. Lark L. Ritson, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiffs

Approved as to form and content:

20130418

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.