Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martin Louis Saiz v. Hanford Police Department

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 24, 2013

MARTIN LOUIS SAIZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DECLARING "THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT" INVALID AND OF NO LEGAL EFFECT (Doc. 26)

On April 19, 2013, reporting that Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, had served them with a Third Amended Complaint that has not been filed with the Clerk of Court, Defendants moved to strike the Third Amended Complaint.

If a party has already amended its pleadings once as a matter of course, further amendment requires the consent of the adverse party or leave of the court. F.R.Civ.P. 15(a). As Defendants correctly observed, Plaintiff has neither filed a motion for leave to amend his second amended complaint nor filed the actual third amended complaint with this Court.

Accordingly, the Court hereby DECLARES that the so-called third amended complaint served by Plaintiff on Defendants on April 3, 2013, is invalid and of no legal force or effect. The motion hearing noticed by Defendants is vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130424

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.