Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martin Louis Saiz v. Hanford Police Department

April 24, 2013

MARTIN LOUIS SAIZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HANFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DECLARING "THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT" INVALID AND OF NO LEGAL EFFECT (Doc. 26)

On April 19, 2013, reporting that Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, had served them with a Third Amended Complaint that has not been filed with the Clerk of Court, Defendants moved to strike the Third Amended Complaint.

If a party has already amended its pleadings once as a matter of course, further amendment requires the consent of the adverse party or leave of the court. F.R.Civ.P. 15(a). As Defendants correctly observed, Plaintiff has neither filed a motion for leave to amend his second amended complaint nor filed the actual third amended complaint with this Court.

Accordingly, the Court hereby DECLARES that the so-called third amended complaint served by Plaintiff on Defendants on April 3, 2013, is invalid and of no legal force or effect. The motion hearing noticed by Defendants is vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130424

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.