Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States Ethernet Innovations LLC v. Acer, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

April 26, 2013

U.S. Ethernet Innovations LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
Acer, Inc., et al., Defendants. Intel Corp., Nvidia Corp., Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Atheros Communications, Inc. and Broadcom Corp., Intervenors, ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International, Third-Party Plaintiffs, Silicon Integrated Systems Corp., Third-Party Defendant.

COOLEY LLP MATTHEW J. BRIGHAM, (191428) KYLE D. CHEN, (239501) LAM K. NGUYEN, (265285) Palo Alto, California. Attorneys for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL [See signature page for additional counsel]

Thomas J. Friel, Jr., (80065) San Francisco, CA James P. Brogan, Esq., (155906) Broomfield, CO. Attorneys for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL

Deborah E. Fishman, DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, Palo Alto, CA. Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORP.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Based on the request of Third-Party Plaintiffs ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS Computer International (collectively "ASUS"), and pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12 the parties submit this stipulated request for an Order extending the time for ASUS to respond to Third-Party Defendant Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation's ("Sis") Motion To Dismiss Third Party Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss" - Dkt. 731) by thirty (30) days, through and including May 29, 2013 and for Sis to file any reply thereto by eight (8) days, through and including June 13, 2013.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties declare through their signature below that:

(1) In light of the Court moving the hearing by approximately 30 days (Dkt. 734), the enlargement of time is requested to allow the parties to continue discussions about possible resolutions to the Motion to Dismiss;

(2) This is the first request for enlargement of time relating to the Motion to Dismiss; and

(3) The time modification will not have an effect on the schedule for the case. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is set for June 27, 2013.

FILER'S ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(I)(3)

I, Matthew J. Brigham, attest that concurrence in the filing of this STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER has been obtained from each of the other signatories. Executed this 25th day of April, 2013, at Palo Alto, California.

/s/Matthew J. Brigham

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore;

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.