Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Paul M. Carrick v. Santa Cruz County and Planning

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION


May 2, 2013

PAUL M. CARRICK,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ NEAL COONERTY, JOHN LEOPOLD, ELLEN PIRIE, GREG CAPUT, MARK W. STONE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, COUNTY RECORDER SEAN SALDAVIA, COUNTY COUNSEL DANA MCRAE, ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL TAMYRA RICE, SUSAN MAURIELLO AND DOES 1-25 INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Lucy H. Koh U.S. District Court Judge

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties hereto do hereby stipulate to the Court continuing the hearing on the County's 23 second motion to dismiss in the above-referenced case from May 9, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in San 24 Francisco, CA to May 16, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in San Jose, CA. 25 26

Dated: May 1, 2013 /S/ 27 PAUL M. CARRICK, Plaintiff In Pro Per Carrick v. County of Santa Cruz, et al. Dated: May 1, 2013 DANA McRAE, COUNTY COUNSEL 2 3 By: /S/ TAMYRA RICE 4 Assistant County Counsel Attorneys for All County of 5 Santa Cruz Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties as set forth above, and for good cause shown, it is 3 hereby ordered that the hearing on the Defendant County's second motion to dismiss in this action is 4 continued from May 9, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in San Francisco, CA to May 16, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in San Jose 5 Jose, CA.

20130502

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.