UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
TITLE: HEIDI AMAYA
JASON JOHN VAN BEEK ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Michelle Urie N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: None Present None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING PRIOR ORDERS AND REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT
On March 24, 2010, the Court remanded this action to state court on the grounds that Plaintiff Heidi Amaya's Second Amended Complaint contained only state law causes of action. (Dkt. No. 114.) Ms. Amaya appealed the Court's order of remand to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a memorandum decision filed March 21, 2013, the Ninth Circuit concluded that remand was required because Ms. Amaya's "original complaint provided no basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction, making removal improper." (Dkt. No. 129 [Mandate] at 2.) The Ninth Circuit directed this Court to vacate its prior orders and remand the action to state court. (Id.) Accordingly, the Court's prior orders in the action are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to Orange County Superior Court.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.