The opinion of the court was delivered by: R. Gary Klausner, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 0 3 8 5 (Last 4 digits)
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. MAY 6 2013
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Conspiracy, in violation of 18 USC 371, as charged in Count One of the Indictment The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately. Any unpaid balance shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $10,000, which shall bear interest as
The fine shall be paid in full immediately.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Dan Xin Li, is hereby committed on Count One of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of EIGHT (8) MONTHS.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of THREE (3) YEARS under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Probation Office, General Order 05-02, and General Order 01-05, including the three special conditions delineated in General Order 01-05;
The defendant shall participate for a period of SIX (6) MONTHS in a home detention program, as directed by the Probation Officer;
The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance.
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall comply with the immigration rules and regulations of the United States, and if deported or removed from this country, either voluntarily or involuntarily, not re-enter the United States illegally. The defendant is not required to report to the Probation Office while residing outside of the United States; however, within 72 hours of release from any custody or any re-entry to the United States during the period of Court-ordered supervision, the defendant shall report for instructions to the United States Probation Office, located at the United States Court House, 312 North Spring Street, Room 600, Los Angeles, California 90012;
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant;
Defendant, in the course of her employment, shall not accept more than $5,000 in cash from a customer per transaction, and defendant, in the course of her employment, shall not direct any of her employees to accept more than $5,000 in cash from a customer per transaction;
Defendant, in the course of her employment, shall not accept cash from any individual who is not a customer of her employer;
Defendant, in the course of her employment, shall not receive any cash deposits of any amount in the business bank account(s) of her employer; and
Defendant, in the course of her employment, shall not accept any form of payment from individuals or companies who are not customers of her employer.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Defendant understands that forfeiture, in the amount of $2,000,000 is part of the judgment in this case, and that those funds shall be forfeited to the United States. Counsel ...