Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Julio Flores, et al v. National Railroard Passenger Corp. Dba Amtrak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California


May 9, 2013

JULIO FLORES, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
NATIONAL RAILROARD PASSENGER CORP. DBA AMTRAK, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maria-Elena James United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT REQUESTS

11 12 The Court is in receipt of the parties' request for a case management conference. Upon review of the parties' request, the Court finds a conference unnecessary and ORDERS as follows: C C 14 To the extent that the parties all seek to extend case management deadlines (including (including rebuttal expert reports), they shall comply with the undersigned's discovery

For the Northern District of California For the Northern District of California For the Northern District of California 1) 15 deposing experts), they shall file a stipulation and proposed order; D 16 2) To the extent that the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding any deadlines 18 standing order; 19 3) To the extent that the parties object to the content of expert reports, such objections are 20 properly addressed through rebuttal expert reports, objections filed as part of or in opposition 21 to a summary judgment motion, or in motions in limine; and 22 4) Any party submitting the train's locomotive video (or any other video) shall manually file it 23 in compliance with Civil Local 5-1(f). 24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130509

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.