Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Singh

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

May 9, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JASWINDER SINGH, Defendant.

ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 068525, NICHOLAS A. CAPOZZI, CSBN: 275568, LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY P. CAPOZZI, Fresno, California, Attorney for Defendant, JASWINDER SINGH.

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 13, 2013, at 1:00 p.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until June 3, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. and to exclude time between May 13, 2013, and June 3, 2013, under 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv). Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The defendant filed a Motion to Suppress which is scheduled to be heard in front of the Honorable Anthony W. Ishii on June 3, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.
b. The parties request that the government's response to the motion be due on May 23, 2013, and the defendant's reply be due on May 28, 2013.
c. The government does not object to the continuance.
d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 13, 2013, to June 3, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.