May 10, 2013
MIGUEL ANGEL VILLALOBOS, Petitioner,
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.
Villalobos filed a habeas petition on June 7, 2012, which was referred to Magistrate Judge Major for report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Judge Major issued her R&R on March 11, 2013, recommending that Villalobos's petition be denied. She also ordered that any objections to her R&R be filed by April 1, 2013. Villalobos has not filed an objection, however, and this is of substantial consequence.
"The court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. §636(b). Moreover, 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1) does not require some lesser review by the district court when no objections are filed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985). The Ninth Circuit has interpreted the language of 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1), and determined that the "statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it to be well-researched, extremely thorough, and correct. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS it. Villalobos's habeas petition is therefore DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.