Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Crescencio Galvez et al v. Touch-Tel U.S.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 10, 2013

CRESCENCIO GALVEZ ET AL
v.
TOUCH-TEL U.S.A., L.P. DBA TOUCH-TEL USA, LLC

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable R. Gary Klausner, U.S. District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Sharon L. Williams (Not Present) Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Opposition to Motion for Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Should not be Stricken

On April 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Joint Motion for Entry of Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Program. Objectors Cecilia Ibanez, Jose Baltazar, Mitjavila Ochoa, and the Proposed California Class in LASC BC488697 ("Objectors") filed an Opposition to the motion.

Court records indicate that no class has been certified. Court records also indicate that Objectors are not direct parties or parties in intervention to the current action. As such, the Court orders Objectors to show cause in writing no later than May 16, 2013, why the opposition should not be stricken as an improper filing. Objectors' response shall not exceed 5 pages in length. Parties to the action may also file a response, subject to the same deadline and page limitations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Initials of Preparer

20130510

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.