Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kfd Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff v. City of Eureka

May 14, 2013

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF - COUNTER-DEFENDANT - CROSS- DEFENDANT,
v.
CITY OF EUREKA, DEFENDANT - COUNTER-CLAIMANT - CROSS-CLAIMANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jacqueline Scott Corley United States Magistrate Judge

United States District Court Northern District of California

ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

The parties appeared before the Court for a telephonic discovery hearing on May 13, 2013. As discussed at the hearing, the parties are meeting and conferring to attempt to resolve an outstanding dispute regarding expert discovery. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding this matter, they are to file a joint statement on May 24, 2013. The parties also discussed the possibility of the City of Eureka filing a motion to continue the trial date. Upon consultation with the District Court, the parties are advised that any such motion shall be heard by the undersigned judge.

Accordingly, if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute themselves, they shall file a joint statement regarding the expert discovery dispute and a joint statement regarding the request to continue the trial date by noon, May 24, 2013. Both matters shall be heard on May 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom F, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20130514

© 1992-2013 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.