IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 17, 2013
PHUOC LUU, PETITIONER,
KATHLEEN L. DICKSON, RESPONDENT.
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. However, petitioner has commenced this action in the wrong district. In a habeas action, venue is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. 2241(d).
The petition reflects that petitioner is currently incarcerated at California State Prison, Centinela, which is located in Imperial County. Dckt. No. at 7. The instant petition challenges the results of a disciplinary decision that occurred while petitioner was incarcerated at California State Prison, Centinela. Thus, the Eastern District is not a proper venue for this action. Since this action should have been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, the court will transfer this action to that district. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(d), 1404(a).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.