Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Springfield v. Allen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

May 23, 2013

CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff,
v.
K. ALLEN, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

By order filed May 2, 2013, plaintiff was directed to re-file a signed and dated original complaint. On May 13, 2013, plaintiff submitted a signed and dated original complaint. (ECF No. 7 at 3-15.) The Clerk of the Court is directed to separate pages 3 to 15 from plaintiff's May 13, 2013 filing, and docket the signed, original complaint as a separate docket entry, filed May 8, 2013, the operative filing date under the mailbox rule. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 275-76 (1988) (pro se prisoner filing is dated from the date prisoner delivers it to prison authorities).

Defendants are advised that plaintiff initially submitted exhibits to the complaint, which are not appended to the newly-signed complaint, but are a part of the court record for all purposes. (ECF No. 1 at 14-107.)

Plaintiff alleges his due process rights were violated in connection with a classification committee hearing held on August 25, 2011, without plaintiff's presence, and he claims he was wrongfully retained in maximum custody pending submission of an insufficient gang validation package. Plaintiff also alleges his due process rights were violated in connection with classification hearings held on January 11, 18, and 25, 2012. Plaintiff further alleges that defendants' decision to retain him in maximum security deprived him of critically needed mental health treatment as ordered on August 3, 2011, in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

The complaint states potentially cognizable due process and Eighth Amendment claims for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall separate pages 3 to 15 from plaintiff's May 13, 2013 filing (ECF No. 7), and docket the signed, original complaint (ECF No. 7:3-15) as a separate docket entry, filed May 8, 2013.

4. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: K. Allen, V. Singh, and E. Arnold.

5. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff three USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed May 8, 2013.

6. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
b. One completed summons;
c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 4 above; and
d. Four copies of the endorsed complaint filed May 8, 2013.

7. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.