Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lee v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

May 28, 2013

JESSICA LEE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff,
v.
STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Vermont corporation, and TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Defendants.

DAN MARMALEFSKY (CA SBN 95477), MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, Los Angeles, California.

TIFFANY CHEUNG (CA SBN 211497), MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant STONEBRIDGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

LAW OFFICES OF ALEXANDER E. SKLAVOS, PC, ALEXANDER SKLAVOS, Attorneys for Defendant. TRIFECTA MARKETING GROUP LLC

EDELSON LLC, RYAN ANDREWS, Attorneys for Plaintiff JESSICA LEE and the class

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF NOTICE PLAN FOR FOUR WEEKS

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

Defendant Stonebridge Life Insurance Company ("Stonebridge"), Trifecta Marketing Group LLC ("Trifecta" and collectively with Stonebridge, "Defendants") and Plaintiff Jessica Lee (collectively with Defendants, the "parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby enter into the following stipulation:

WHEREAS on March 7, 2013 the Court issued a Case Management Scheduling Order ("Scheduling Order") stating that all non-expert discovery must be completed on or before June 21, 2013;

WHEREAS several sets of discovery requests propounded by plaintiff and Stonebridge remain outstanding;

WHEREAS the parties have been engaged in pursuing other discovery, including discovery against third parties;

WHEREAS, on May 22, 2013, the Court issued an Order regarding Plaintiff's proposed plan to provide notice to the class of the pendency of this class action;

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to explore private mediation in an attempt to resolve their dispute on mutually acceptable terms;

WHEREAS the parties desire to preserve the status quo vis-à-vis discovery and implementation of the notice plan and prevent the parties and the Court from unnecessarily expending additional resources pending mediation;

THEREFORE, subject to the approval of the Court, the parties agree and stipulate as follows:

1. All discovery in this action, including third-party discovery, taking of depositions, and litigation of discovery ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.