Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Perez-Correa

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

June 6, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
ANDRES PEREZ-CORREA, Defendant.

ORDER

WILLIAM Q. HAYES, District Judge.

The matter before the Court is the motion to suppress statements filed by the Defendant Andres Perez-Correa. (ECF No. 15).

FACTS

On October 24, 2012, at approximately 7:28 a.m., Defendant Andres Perez-Correa applied for admission into the United States from Mexico at the Andrade Port of Entry. Defendant was the driver and sole occupant of a Chrysler Sebring. The primary officer referred the Defendant for secondary inspection after receiving a TECs hit on the license plate of the vehicle. Defendant was escorted to the security office. Defendant waited in the office.

In secondary inspection, Customs and Border Patrol Officers (CPBO) conducted a 7 point inspection of the vehicle. The vehicle was taken to the lift area and placed on a lift. CBPO Dahin observed that the oil drain plug was loose and that all of the bolts securing the oil pan were not tightened. Officers drained the oil from the oil pan and saw what appeared to be a metal box inside the oil pan. Using a fiber optic scope, CBPO Dahin saw a non-factory metal box and caulking secreted inside the oil pan. Officers removed the bolts to the oil pan, pried the oil pan loose, removed the metal box, and opened the metal box. Inside the metal box, officers found four plastic heat sealed packages. Inspection of the substance in the packages field tested positive for methamphetamine and heroin. The search of the vehicle and the discovery of the drugs took approximately one hour.

At approximately 8:30 a.m., Defendant was placed under arrest. Homeland Security Investigator Special Agent Ben Bentancurd was notified of the drug seizure and traveled to the Andrade Port of Entry to take the Defendant into custody. With travel time and traffic delay, Agent Bentancurd and his partner arrived at the Andrade Port of Entry approximately one hour and twenty minutes after being notified of the drug seizure and arrest.

Upon arrival, Special Agent Bentancurd looked over the vehicle, inspected the oil pan and the metal container concealing the narcotics, and reviewed the prepared reports. Special Agent Bentancurd and his partner transported the Defendant to the Calexico, California West Port of Entry prior to interviewing the Defendant in order to use the recording capabilities at the Calexico POE.

At approximately 1:27 p.m., Special Agent Bentancurd and his partner began the interview of the Defendant. The interview was conducted in English. At approximately 1:40 p.m., the agents informed the Defendant of his Miranda rights and inquired "okay, do you want to speak to me right now?" Defendant responded: "Okay." (ECF No. 15-2 at 7). Defendant initialed but did not sign a Statement of Rights form. Special Agent Betancurd indicated on the Statement of Rights form that Defendant "was taken into custody at 0728 (time), on 10/24/2012 (date)." (ECF No. 15-2 at 25). The video shows the Defendant initialing the form and waiving his Miranda rights. The video of the interview has a clear stamp on the face of the photo indicating OCTOBER 24, 2012 1:27 PM. The same time stamp appears on the entire video. There is no running time on the video. Defendant proceeded to answer the agents' questions. (ECF No. 19-1).

The "Report Of Investigation" prepared by Agent Bentancurd states in part: "At approximately 1340 hours, on 10.24.2012, PEREZ was advised of his Constitutional rights according to Miranda." (ECF No. 15-2 at 17). The "Report Of Investigation" states: "The interview of PEREZ was completed at approximately 1430 hours." Id. at 18.

After the interview, Defendant was taken to the Imperial County Jail and booked. The booking form prepared by Agent Bentancurd states in part: "TIME OF ARREST: 0728 HRS". (ECF No. 15-2 at 27). After booking the Defendant into the jail, Agent Bentancurd prepared a complaint in this case for review by the United States Attorney and presentment to the United States Magistrate Judge.

On October 25, 2012, Defendant appeared before the United States Magistrate Judge.

On January 3, 2013, Defendant was indicted for importing heroin and methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, and 960.

CONTENTIONS OF PARTIES

Defendant contends that his statements made during the interrogation that occurred more than six hours after his arrest must be suppressed because the Government did not bring him before a Magistrate Judge within six hours and the delay was for the purpose of interrogating him. Defendant contends that the Government has not advanced any purpose or reason for conducting the interview beyond the six-hour safe harbor and that his statements cannot be admitted under 18 U.S.C. §3501(c). The Government asserts that the Defendant was arrested at 8:30 a.m. and the interview commenced at 1:27 p.m., less than five hours after his arrest and within the six hour "safe harbor." The Government contends that there was no unreasonable or unnecessary delay in presentment. The Government asserts that presentment the day after the arrest was reasonable in order for the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.