Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Luchini v. Carmax, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

June 7, 2013

MICHAEL LUCHINI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
CARMAX, INC.; CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.; and CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC. Defendants.

Kelly M. Dermody (Cal. Bar No. 171716), Jahan C. Sagafi (Cal. Bar No. 224887), LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Class Members.

Jack S. Sholkoff (Cal Bar No. 145097), Christopher W. Decker (Cal Bar No. 229426), OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

The parties hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on March 21, 2012, Plaintiff Michael Luchini ("Plaintiff") filed his Complaint in this action;

WHEREAS, on April 24, 2012, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, on May 29, 2012, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, on July 23, 2012, this Court granted the motion to compel arbitration brought by Defendants CarMax, Inc., CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc., and CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC ("CarMax"), compelling Mr. Luchini to proceed in arbitration on an individual basis (Docket No. 70);

WHEREAS, since that time, the case has been stayed, and the parties have submitted periodic status reports to the Court regarding the possibility of Mr. Luchini pursuing arbitration, the parties pursuing settlement discussions, and the relevance of the Ninth Circuit's decision on April 11, 2013 in Kilgore v. KeyBank Nat. Ass'n., Nos. 09-16703 & 10-15934, ___ F.3d ___, 2013 U.S.App. LEXIS 7312, 2013 WL 1458876 (9th Cir. 2013) ( en banc );

WHEREAS, on May 21, 2013, the parties filed a further status report noting their agreement to seek voluntary dismissal of Plaintiff's claims with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), so that the Court may enter judgment and the Plaintiff may appeal the Court's arbitration order; and

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2013, the Court ordered the parties to file dismissal documents within 14 days (Docket No. 87).

The parties respectfully request that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs, and enter the [Proposed] Final Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.

IT IS SO ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.