Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

June 14, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
THEO ADAMS and RACHEL SIDERS, Defendant,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, R. STEVEN LAPHAM, MICHELE BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorneys, CHRISTOPHER HAYDN-MYER Counsel for Theo Adams EDUARDO G. ROY Counsel for Rachel Siders Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, United States of America.

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for a status conference June 18, 2013.

2. By this stipulation, defendants move to continue the status conference to August 6, 2013 at 9:45 a.m. and to exclude time between June 18, 2013 and August 6, 2013 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request, and has agreed to file this stipulation on behalf of all parties due to the unavailability of defense counsel.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The government represents that the discovery associated with this case includes investigative reports and voluminous records in electronic form totaling approximately 1, 700 pages. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.

b. Counsel for defendants have received plea agreements from the government and they desire additional time to consult with their clients, to review the charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, to discuss potential resolutions with their clients, and to otherwise prepare for trial.

c. Additionally, counsel for defendants have scheduling conflicts that make the previously set June 18, 2013 status conference unworkable. Defense counsel for Adams has had a death in the family and will be fulfilling various family obligations next week. Defense counsel for Siders represents that he has been in trial for the past six weeks and will still be in court next.

d. Defense counsel need additional time, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, to review the materials described above and to discuss them with their clients, and otherwise effectively prepare for the disposition of this case. Based on the Court's available calendars and the availability of defense counsel, the parties ask that the Court set this matter for a status conference on August 6, 2013, and that it find excludable time from June 18, 2013 through and including the August 6, 2013 status conference. Because of the need for additional preparation outlined above, a denial of a continuance to August 6, 2013 would deny the parties the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case and excluding time as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of June 18, 2013 to August 6, 2013 inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.