DAVID B. TURNER, JR., Inmate Booking No. 13719099. Plaintiff,
CORPORAL SAUNDER; SAN DIEGO SHERIFF DEP'T; SCOTT TORRES; CORPORAL SEELEY, Defendants.
ORDER: (1) DISMISSING ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); and (2) DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, currently housed at the George Bailey Detention Facility located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has also filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [ECF No. 2].
I. SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, however, the Court is obligated to review civil actions filed by anyone "incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms or conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program, " "as soon as practicable after docketing" and regardless of whether the prisoner prepays filing fees or moves to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (c). Because Plaintiff was a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(c) at the time he filed this action, the Court must sua sponte dismiss his complaint, or any portion thereof, which "seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity, " if it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (b); Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010).
Here, the Court finds that Plaintiff's action is frivolous as it is duplicative of an action Plaintiff previously filed. Plaintiff's Complaint contains identical claims that are found in Turner v. San Diego Central Jail, et al., S.D. Cal Civil Case No. 13cv1133 WQH (BGS). A court "may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue." United States ex rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc., 971 F.2d 244, 248 (9th Cir. 1992).
A prisoner's complaint is considered frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) if it "merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims." Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995) (construing former 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)) (citations and internal quotations omitted). Because Plaintiff has already litigated the same claims presented in the instant action in Turner v. San Diego Central Jail, et al., S.D. Cal Civil Case No. 13cv1133 WQH (BGS), the Court hereby DISMISSES Civil Case No. 13cv368 MMA (DHB) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). See Cato, 70 F.3d at 1105 n.2; Resnick, 213 F.3d at 446 n.1.
II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). In addition, the Court finds further amendment would be futile. See Cahill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir. 1996) (denial of a leave to amend is not ...