Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Clark v. Herbalife International, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

July 3, 2013

JENNIFER NOWICKI CLARK, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC., and HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A., Robert G. Eisler (Pro Hac Vice), Wilmington, DE, BLECHER COLLINS PEPPERMAN & JOYE, P.C., Maxwell M. Blecher (State Bar No. 26202), Donald R. Pepperman (State Bar No. 109809), Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, JENNIFER NOWICKI CLARK.

VENABLE LLP, Daniel S. Silverman, Los Angeles, CA, VENABLE LLP, Ian D. Volner (Pro Hac Vice), Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

CARLA WOEHRLE, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), Plaintiff, Jennifer Nowicki Clark and Defendants, Herbalife International, Inc. and Herbalife International of America, Inc., through undersigned counsel, jointly submit this Stipulated Protective Order to govern the handling of information and materials produced in the course of discovery or filed with the Court in this action.

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.4, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file materials under seal, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order.

2.2. "Confidential" Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c).

2.3. Designated House Counsel: House Counsel who seeks access to "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" information in this matter.

2.4. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" or "CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSELS' EYES ONLY."

2.5. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.

2.6. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its Outside

Counsel of Record to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a Party's competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party's competitor.

2.7. "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Information or Items: extremely sensitive "Confidential Information or Items, " disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means.

2.8. "CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSELS' EYES ONLY" Information or Items: extremely sensitive "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Information or Items, " disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party or their House Counsel would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means.

2.9. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

2.10. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

2.11. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys (as well as their support staff) who are not employees of a Party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party.

2.12. Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staff).

2.13. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action.

2.14. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services ( e.g ., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors.

2.15. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY, " or "CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSELS'EYES ONLY."

2.16. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosures to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.

4. DURATION

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Stipulation and Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1. Exercise of Restraint and Reasonable Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify - so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose ( e.g. , to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) are prohibited. If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.