Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hughes v. California Dep't. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

July 3, 2013

BERNARD HUGHES, Plaintiff,
v.
CALIFORNIA DEP'T. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF #9.)

In the October 16, 2012 screening order the court determined that plaintiff s amended complaint stated a cognizable inadequate medical care claim under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Fong, Malet, Awatani and Street. Plaintiff was ordered to submit documents, including USM-285 forms, for service of the amended complaint on defendants. In an order filed June 10, 2013, the court noted that plaintiff had failed to submit a USM-285 form for defendant Lawrence Fong. (ECF #31.) Plaintiff was then ordered to submit a USM-285 form for defendant Fong within fourteen days from the service of the court's order and cautioned that if he failed to do so, defendant Fong ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.