Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Balletto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

August 6, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
RYAN ALAN BALLETTO, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612), United States Attorney, J. DOUGLAS WILSON (DCBN 412811), Chief, Criminal Division, KEVIN J. BARRY (CABN 229748), MATTHEW L. McCARTHY (CABN 217871), Assistant United States Attorneys, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for United States of America.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DETENTION

NANDOR J. VADAS, Magistrate Judge.

On July 24, 2013, at 1:00 p.m., the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on the government's motion for the detention of Defendant Ryan Alan Balletto pending trial. The Court has reviewed and considered the following materials: (1) the papers filed in this case, including the Complaint, the Affidavit of Special Agent Andrew Jensen in support of the Complaint, the government's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Detention; (2) the report prepared by Pretrial Services; and (3) arguments by counsel for the government and by counsel for the defendant made during the July 24, 2013 hearing. After careful deliberation, the Court makes the following determination:

Under the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3141 et seq. , there is a presumption that a defendant should be detained pending trial in cases where there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a drug trafficking offense that features a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more. Here, the defendant is charged with violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 861, both of which carry maximum terms of imprisonment of life. Accordingly, the Court finds that the presumption of detention applies in this case. Furthermore, for the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the defendant has not rebutted the presumption in favor of detention.

Specifically, the Court finds that the government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that, should he be released, the defendant poses a danger to the community and to other persons, and that there exists no condition or reasonable combination of conditions that would sufficiently mitigate this danger. In reaching this conclusion, the Court finds the following:

• In the course of the charged conspiracy, the defendant used a 15 year-old girl to manufacture marijuana.
• During the course of the charged conspiracy, the defendant sexually abused the 15 year-old girl.
• The defendant's sexual abuse of the 15 year-old girl included oral copulation and sodomy.
• Agents located a "rack" on the defendant's property that appears to have been designed to restrain a person.
• Forensic analysts found bloodstains beneath the "rack."
• Agents located wooden beams which included a metal and leather harness on the defendant's property.
• Agents located a 4' × 2' × 2' metal box on the defendant's property that had been modified to imprison a person.
• Inside the metal box, agents located human hair and a blanket.
• The defendant imprisoned the 15 year-old girl in the metal box on two occasions for ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.