Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Keovilay

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

August 13, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
KHAMLE KEOVILAY, et al., Defendants.

DENNIS S. WAKS, BAR #142581, Attorney at Law, Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant KHAMLE KEOVILAY.

ALICE W. WONG, Attorney for DAVID CHENG

MICHAEL B. BIGELOW, Attorney for MINH THAM

MICHAEL D. LONG, Attorney for DUNG NGUYEN

OLAF W. HEDBERG, Attorney for SANG HIN SAELEE

CHRISTOPHER H. WING, Attorney for LONG NGUYEN

KEN GIFFARD, Attorney for TUAN DAO

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney

TODD D.LERAS, Assistant U.S. Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to by the United States of America through TODD D. LERAS, Assistant United States Attorney, defendant, KHAMLE KEOVILAY, by and though his counsel, DENNIS S. WAKS, defendant, DAVID CHENG by and through his attorney, ALICE W. WONG, defendant MINGH THAM, by and through his attorney, MICHAEL B. BIGELOW, defendant DUNG NGUYEN, by and through his attorney, MICHAEL D. LONG, SANG HIN SAELEE, by and through his attorney, OLAF W. HEDBERG, defendant LONG NGUYEN, by and through his attorney, CHRISTOPHER H. WING, and defendant TUAN DAO, by and through his attorney, KEN GIFFARD, that the status conference set for Thursday, August 15, 2013, be continued to a status conference on Thursday, September 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.

This continuance is being requested because defense counsel needs additional time to prepare, to review discovery, and to interview witnesses. The parties have received a large amount of discovery, including Title III documents.

Furthermore, the parties stipulate and agree that the interest of justice served by granting this continuance outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. (18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A)).

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for September 19, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.