ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO APPROVE COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT
KANDIS WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
On April 30, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a notice of settlement in principle with Defendant The Hershey Company ("Hershey"). (Dkt. No. 254.) On July 18, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an unopposed motion for approval of the collective action settlement of this action, including Plaintiffs' claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the wage and hour laws of California, and California's Unfair Competition Law, Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq., and Plaintiffs' attorney fees and costs, a request to dismiss this action with prejudice, and to bind all members of the Settlement Collective to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, regardless of whether or not they have signed a Consent to Collective Action Settlement. Supplemental Declarations in support of the unopposed motion were filed on July 25, 2013 and August 1, 2013. The parties have consented to jurisdiction of the Court for all purposes.
This case is not proceeding as a class action under Rule 23, so that Rule's requirement for approval of class action settlements does not apply. However, courts have held that FLSA settlements which are not approved by the Department of Labor should be presented for court approval and that "the District Court may enter a stipulated judgment only after scrutinizing the settlement for fairness." Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. By & Through U.S. Dep't of Labor, Employment Standards Admin., Wage & Hour Div., 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir. 1982); Lee v. The Timberland Co., C 07-2367 JF, 2008 WL 2492295 (N.D. Cal. June 19, 2008).
Here, the settlement consists of three parts: (1) a substantial payment to each named plaintiff and to each person who has opted in to the action; (2) additional payments to the three plaintiffs who brought FLSA retaliation claims; (3) and the payment of attorneys' fees and costs to the plaintiffs' counsel. Because it is a settlement, the parties have requested that the amounts be kept confidential. Having reviewed the settlement, the Court finds that it is fair and approves it. The Court further finds that the parties are settling a bona fide dispute which is set forth in the pleadings and in the various rulings the Court has made, which rulings are subject to the uncertainty of an appeal.
Having reviewed the settlement amounts, the Court finds that the payments to the 153 plaintiffs are fair and reasonable. Indeed, they are substantial. These payments are the result of arms-length negotiations between Hershey and the 153 plaintiffs who are represented by counsel, and who have all expressly consented to the settlement.
Finally, the Court finds that the amount of attorney's fees and costs to be fair and reasonable given the substantial effort expended by plaintiffs' counsel and the result they achieved. For the foregoing reasons IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court certifies the Settlement Collective defined in Paragraphs 14 and 18 of the Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Collective Action Release ("Settlement Stipulation"), approves Thomas J. Brandi and Brian J. Malloy, and the Brandi Law Firm, and David C. Feola and Hoban & Feola, LLC, as Collective Action Counsel, and approves the Garden City Group as Claims Administrator.
2. Adequate notice of the Settlement Stipulation, the material terms thereof, and the fact that this hearing was pending, has been provided to the Settlement Collective by Collective Action Counsel, fully satisfying the requirements of due process.
3. Approval of the Settlement Stipulation, including the releases contained therein, the payments to Plaintiffs and Collective Action Counsel's attorney fees and costs, is GRANTED.
4. All 153 members of the Settlement Collective are bound to the terms of the Settlement Agreement, regardless of whether or not they have signed a Consent to Collective Action Settlement. Specifically, as of the date of this Approval Order and the Effective Date as set forth in the Settlement Stipulation, all members of the Settlement Collective - including the Named Plaintiffs - are deemed to have released, discharged, and covenanted not to sue The Hershey Company, and all of its respective past and present employees, directors, officers, attorneys, representatives, insurers, agents, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, related companies, predecessors, successors, lessees, and assigns, and any entity that could be jointly liable with any of these (individually and collectively "the Hershey Releasees") with respect to and from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, disputed wages, obligations, attorneys' fees, damages, penalties, interest, judgments, orders, and liabilities of whatever kind or nature in law, equity or otherwise, whether now known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, and whether or not concealed or hidden, which arose on or before June 12, 2013 and arose out of or are in any way connected with or related to: (i) violations or alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq.; (ii) violations or alleged violations of the California Labor Code, including but not limited to sections 203, 226, 226.7, 510, 515.5, 512, 551, 552, 1194, 1198, and/or 2802; (iii) violations or alleged violations of California Business & Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq.; (iv) violations or alleged violations of the provisions of Industrial Welfare Commission Order No. 4-2001 (or any other applicable order of the Industrial Welfare Commission), including but not limited to sections 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12, 17, and/or 20; (v) any other allegation contained in, related to, subsumed by, or which could have been alleged in, the current and/or prior complaints in the Zulewski Action; (vi) any and all fines, penalties, wages, premium wages, interest, restitution, liquidated damages, punitive damages, declaratory relief, and/or injunctive relief allegedly due and owing by virtue of the allegations referenced in Paragraph 45 of the Settlement Stipulation; and (vii) claims for attorneys' fees and/or attorneys' costs/expenses allegedly due and owing by virtue of the allegations referenced in Paragraph 45 of the Settlement Stipulation (collectively, the "Released Claims"). This release of the Released Claims is general and comprehensive in nature and includes all claims and potential claims against the Hershey Releasees which were brought by the Zulewksi Action, arise from and/or relate to the claims brought in the Zulewski Action, or could have been raised in the Zulewksi Action, to the maximum extent permitted at law; provided, however, that this release does not apply to claims not referenced in this Paragraph 45 of the Settlement Stipulation, including but not limited to claims arising from discrimination. All members of the Settlement Collective, including Named Plaintiffs, who worked for Hershey in California as RSRs during the Collective Action Period by this Order have waived any and all rights or benefits conferred on them by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code. As of the date of this Order and the Effective Date, all members of the Settlement Collective are hereby forever barred and enjoined from prosecuting any of the Released Claims against any of the Hershey Releasees.
5. The Court directs the parties and the Claims Administrator to effectuate the Settlement Stipulation's terms as set forth in the Settlement Stipulation.
6. Pursuant to Paragraph 51 of the Settlement Stipulation, neither the Settlement Stipulation nor this Approval Order nor any of the terms in either constitute an admission by Hershey, or any of the other Hershey Releasees, of liability.
7. Pursuant to Paragraph 26 of the Settlement Stipulation, if the Settlement does not become final and effective in accordance with the terms set forth in the Settlement Stipulation, this Approval Order, and all orders entered in connection ...