Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Ma

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

August 21, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
HUANCHANG MA, Defendant.

JOHN R. MANNING (SBN 220874), ATTORNEY AT LAW, Sacramento, CA., Attorney for Defendant, HUANCHANG MA.

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Todd D. Leras, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Huanchang Ma, John R. Manning, Esq., hereby stipulate the following:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on August 22, 2013.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue status conference until August 29, 2013 and to exclude time between August 22, 2013 and August 29, 2013 under the Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare).

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request the Court find the following:

a. This case is one in a series of cases developed from a lengthy DEA/Elk Grove PD/Sac. SO investigation into "grow houses" in the Elk Grove area. Several individuals have been charged. Many, if not all the defendants a part of this investigation are non English speakers and require the services of an interpreter to communicated with. The widespread need for Cantonese/Mandarin interpreters in this case, the companion cases(s), and in general, has made scheduling meetings very difficult. However, as this case is winding up, scheduling has become less difficult. To that end, the Defense has provided the Government with additional discovery and the Government needs to time to review the material and evaluate their next step.
b. The Defense has proffered a proposed resolution to the Government and the Government needs additional time to review the settlement proposal.
c. The Government does not object to the continuance.
d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) within which trial must commence, the time period of August 22, 2013 to August 29, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A)) and (B)(iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED. The status conference currently set for August 22, 2013, is vacated and continued to August 29, 2013, at 9 a.m. in Courtroom 7. The time period between August 22, 2013 and August 29, 2013 is excluded under the Local Code T-4 for the reasons stated in the parties' stipulation. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.