Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Lozano

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

September 24, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
ARGELIO LOZANO, Defendant.

LAW OFFICE OF ERICK L. GUZMAN Santa Rosa, California, Attorney for Defendant Argelio Lozano

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

The defense has requested discovery pertaining to the forthcoming motion. The parties are currently making arrangements regarding the requested discovery. However, additional time is necessary for the parties to resolve outstanding discovery issues. For this reason, the parties request that the briefing schedule be modified as requested. Also, the parties request the hearing be continued to November 20, 2013. The parties further request that time be excluded form the speedy trial clock to allow for adequate preparation of counsel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For good cause shown, the briefing schedule for the above case be modified as follows: The defense motion is due October 16, 2013; the government's response is due October 30, 2013; and the defense reply is November 6, 2013.

The motion hearing is rescheduled to November 20, 2013.

The time between October 23, 2013 and November 20, 2013 be excluded from the speedy trial clock based on the need for effective preparation of counsel per 18 U.S.C. ยง3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.