SCI CALIFORNIA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. AND RELATED CROSSACTIONS
PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION
MARGARET A. NAGLE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on the parties' Confidentiality Stipulation and [Proposed Order] ("Stipulation") filed on August 21, 2013, the terms of the protective order to which the parties have agreed are adopted as a protective order of this Court (which generally shall govern the pretrial phase of this action) except to the extent, as set forth below, that those terms have been substantively modified by the Court's amendment of paragraphs 1(b), 4(a), 4(c), 4(d), 5, 7(c), 8(b)(vii), 10(b)(i), 11, 12(b), 16, and 17(b) of the Stipulation.
The parties are expressly cautioned that the designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential or other designation(s) used by the parties, does not, in and of itself, create any entitlement to file such information, document, or thing, in whole or in part, under seal. Accordingly, reference to this Protective Order or to the parties' designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential or other designation(s) used by the parties, is wholly insufficient to warrant a filing under seal.
There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. The parties' mere designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential or other designation(s) used by parties, does not - without the submission of competent evidence, in the form of a declaration or declarations, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable - constitute good cause.
Further, if sealing is requested in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, then compelling reasons, as opposed to good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n , 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration.
Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Protective Order, in the event that this case proceeds to trial, all information, documents, and things discussed or introduced into evidence at trial will become public and available to all members of the public, including the press, unless sufficient cause is shown in advance of trial to proceed otherwise.
THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO REVIEW CAREFULLY AND ACT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL ORDERS ISSUED BY THE HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, INCLUDING THOSE APPLICABLE TO PROTECTIVE ORDERS AND FILINGS UNDER SEAL.
TERMS OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
(a) Protected Material (as defined below) designated under the terms of this Protective Order shall be used by a Receiving Party solely in connection with this case, pending in the United States District Court for the Central District Of California under case number CV12-07436-GW-MAN (the "Coverage Litigation") or attendant reinsurance claim or retrocessional claims, and shall not be used directly or indirectly for any other purpose whatsoever, except as permitted below.
(b) This Protective Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures during discovery. Designations under this Protective Order shall be made with care and shall not be made absent a good faith belief that the designated material satisfies the criteria set forth below. If it comes to a Producing Party's attention that designated material does not qualify for protection pursuant to this Protective Order, the Producing Party must promptly notify the other Party that it is withdrawing or changing the designation.
(a) "Discovery Material" means all items or information, including from any non-party, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced, disclosed, or generated in connection with discovery or otherwise in this case.
(b) "Outside Counsel" means: (i) outside counsel who appear on the pleadings as counsel for a Party; (ii) partners and associates of such counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation, and their paralegals and support staff; and (iii) outside, independent attorneys contracted to provide legal advice to a Party in connection with this action.
(c) "Party" means any party to this case or its parent or subsidaries or claims organization if involved in this action, including their officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, in-house counsel, outside counsel, and their support staffs.
(d) "Producing Party" means any Party or non-party entity that discloses or produces any Discovery Material in this case.
(e) "Protected Material" means any Discovery Material that is designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" as provided for in this Protective Order.
(f) "Receiving Party" means any Party who receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party.
3. COMPUTATION OF TIME
The computation of any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Protective Order shall be governed by the provisions for computing time set forth in the applicable section of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(a) The protections conferred by this Protective Order cover not only Discovery Material governed by this Protective Order as addressed herein, but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof.
(b) Nothing in this Protective Order shall prevent or restrict a Producing Party's own disclosure or use of its own Discovery Material for any purpose, and nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any Producing Party from showing its Discovery Material to an individual who prepared the Discovery Material.
(c) Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to prejudice any Party's right to use any Protected Material in court or in any court filing with the consent of the Producing Party or pursuant to a subsequent protective order of the Court.
(d) This Protective Order is without prejudice to the right of any Party to seek further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify this Protective Order in any way, including, without limitation, by entry of a ...