Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Smith v. Citrus Heights Water District

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

October 15, 2013

JEROME VERNON SMITH, Plaintiff,
v.
CITRUS HEIGHTS WATER DISTRICT, as part of the SAN JAUN WATER DISTRICT, Defendant.

ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

On August 14, 2013, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that the amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. ECF No. 8. On September 12, 2013, the assigned district judge adopted the findings and recommendations, dismissed the amended complaint, closed the case, and entered judgment accordingly. ECF Nos. 13, 14.

Notwithstanding that judgment, plaintiff has subsequently filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and other documents that are nearly incomprehensible. ECF Nos. 15-18. Plaintiff's recent filings do not constitute proper requests for reconsideration or appeal of the September 12, 2013 order and judgment. Therefore, these documents will be disregarded. Plaintiff is advised that the court will disregard and issue no response to any future filings in this closed case.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's post-judgment filings, ECF Nos. 15-18, are disregarded.

SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.