Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Premier Recycle Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

October 22, 2013

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
PREMIER RECYCLE COMPANY, Defendant.

William W. Funderburk Jr. (SBN 176244) Anna L. Le May (SBN 258312), CASTELLĂ“N & FUNDERBURK LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Defendant Premier Recycle Company.

Andrea Kopecky, Attorney for Plaintiff, SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f); L.R. 16-10

HOWARD R. LLOYD, District Judge.

Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper ("Baykeeper") and Defendant Premier Recycle Company ("Premier Recycle") in the above-captioned action respectfully submit this stipulation as follows:

WHEREAS, Baykeeper and Premier Recycle (collectively, the "Parties") have been working together in good faith to reach a settlement in this action;

WHEREAS, the Parties have already exchanged and are currently finalizing the terms of what they anticipate will be a final Consent Decree for approval by the court;

WHEREAS, the Court's Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines ("Scheduling Order") set the initial Case Management Conference in this matter for July 23, 2013 at 1:30 pm;

WHEREAS, per a previous Stipulation and Order of the Court, the Initial Case Management Conference was continued until August 20, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, per a previous Stipulation and Order of the Court, the Initial Case Management Conference was continued until September 10, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.;

WHEREAS, per a previous Stipulation and Order of the Court, the Initial Case Management Conference was continued until October 1, 2013;

WHEREAS, per a previous Stipulation and Order of the Court, the Initial Case Management Conference was continued until October 29, 2013;

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order states that if the Initial Case Management Conference is continued, the other deadlines are continued accordingly;

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue negotiating settlement in good faith and anticipate reaching a final settlement in this action within the next three (3) weeks;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to November 19, 2013 at 1:30 pm, or as soon thereafter as the Court is available.
2. The Parties' Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement shall be due one week before the Case Management Conference.
3. The Parties shall make initial disclosures or state objections in their Rule 26(f) Report no later than one week before the Case Management Conference.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

1. The Case Management Conference shall be continued to November 19, 2013 at 1:30 pm.
2. The Parties' Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than November 12, 2013.
3. The Parties shall make initial disclosures or state objections in their Rule 26(f) Report no later than November 12, 2013[*]

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.