Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Must Win, Inc. v. La Double 7

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

October 22, 2013

MUST WIN, INC., a California corporation; and URBAN EXPRESSIONS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
LA DOUBLE 7, a California corporation; SHANG JING DING, an individual; DOES 1 through 5 Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Must Win, Inc. and Urban Expressions, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs" or "Urban Expressions") are the exclusive and sole owner of the rights in various URBAN EXPRESSIONS marks in connection with making, marketing and selling high-quality, vegan and animal-free bags, including United States Trademark Registration Nos. 3, 878, 378 and 4, 211, 669 (collectively, the "URBAN EXPRESSIONS Mark");

WHEREAS, Defendants LA Double 7, Inc. ("LA Double 7") and Shang Jing Ding ("Ding") (jointly, severally and collectively "Defendants") obtained Urban Expressions' branded bags from a Chinese distributor and falsely represented, advertised, and/or offered to sell Urban Expressions bags under their own LA Double 7 name and mark (collectively, the "Infringing Products");

WHEREAS, a dispute has arisen between Urban Expressions and Defendants in that Urban Expressions has alleged that Defendants' falsely representing, advertising, and/or offering to sell Urban Expressions bags under the LA Double 7 name and mark violates Urban Expressions' rights in the URBAN EXPRESSIONS Mark and constitutes, among other things, false designation of origin and unfair competition;

WHEREAS, on or about March 5, 2013, Urban Expressions commenced the above-captioned action ("Action") against Defendants, alleging, among other things, claims of trademark infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition;

WHEREAS, Urban Expressions and Defendants have reached a full and final settlement of the Action, which settlement was memorialized in a certain document dated September 11, 2013 (the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Agreement provides, in pertinent part, that Defendants consent to the entry of a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from removing, obliterating and/or covering or assisting others to remove, obliterate or cover the URBAN EXPRESSIONS Mark from Urban Expression products and using or assisting others to use any other mark, logo, name or designation on Urban Expression products.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREE that:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Action and over the parties hereto.

2. Urban Expressions is the owner of the URBAN EXPRESSIONS Marks, which are valid, enforceable, well-known and highly recognized.

3. Defendants engaged in reverse passing off by offering to sell Urban Expression products under another mark, logo, name or designation, such as the LA Double 7 name and mark.

4. Each Defendant and its officers, members, principals, agents, servants, employees and all persons and entities in active concert or participation with any of them, be and hereby are permanently restrained and enjoined from engaging in violating Urban Expressions' rights with respect to the URBAN EXPRESSIONS Marks, either directly or indirectly, in any manner, including:

(a) distributing, circulating, advertising, marketing, promoting, importing, exporting, displaying, shipping, offering for sale or selling Urban Expression products under a mark, logo, name or designation that is not URBAN EXPRESSIONS, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.