Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cardan v. Seaboard Transport, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

October 22, 2013

Cardan
v.
Seaboard Transport, Inc., et al.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Finding Service Upon Defendant Maralez Improper

On September 17, 2013, the Court issued an order to show cause why Defendant Epitasjo Maralez ("Defendant") should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Dkt. # 61. Plaintiff filed a timely Response. Dkt. # 64.

In his Response, Plaintiff claims that he properly effectuated service on Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(B) on October 4, 2013. Resp. ¶¶ 5-6. Plaintiff attaches an Affidavit of Service indicating that a process server visited the address listed on Defendant's driver's license and provided Defendant's brother - a person of suitable age and discretion who resides at the residence - with the summons and related papers. Resp. ¶¶ 4-5, Ex. F. Although Defendant's brother informed the process server that Defendant currently resides in a halfway house in Arizona, address unknown, Plaintiff maintains that service was properly executed pursuant to Rule 4(e)(B). Resp. ¶¶ 6-7, 18-19, Ex. F.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) ("Serving an Individual Within a Judicial District of the United States") provides in pertinent part:

[A]n individual... may be served in a judicial district of the United States by:
(1) following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made; or
(2) doing any of the following:
(A) delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally;
(B) leaving a copy of each at the individual's dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there; or
(C) delivering a copy of each to an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.

Pursuant to Rule 4(e)(1), proper service may also be made by following California law. California law provides for service of a summons upon "persons not otherwise specified" "by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to such person or to a person authorized by him to receive service of process." Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 416.90(b). If, after reasonable diligence, the summons and complaint cannot be personally delivered in accordance with Section 416.90, substituted service is permitted as follows:

[A] summons may be served by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at the person's dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address other than a United States Postal Service post office box, in the presence of a competent member of the household or a person apparently in charge of his or her office, place of business, or usual mailing address other than a United States Postal Service post office box, at least 18 years of age, who shall be informed of the contents thereof, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and the complaint by first-class mail, postage prepaid to the person to be ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.