Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Din v. United States

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

October 23, 2013

WEI-HSUN DIN, as Successor In Interest to Richard Din, Deceased, and as Successor In Interest to Rey-Kung Din, Deceased, Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HARRY LAMPIRIS, GARY A. JARVIS, WALTER M. HOLLERAN and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants.

J. STEVEN KENNEDY (State Bar No. 82066), LAW OFFICES OF J. STEVEN KENNEDY, Pasadena, California, Attorney for Plaintiff Wei-Hsun Din, as Successor In Interest to Richard Din, Deceased, and as Successor In Interest to Rey-Kung Din, Deceased.

MICHAEL D. BRUNO, JEROME SCHREIBSTEIN, GORDON & REES LLP, Attorneys for Defendants, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HARRY LAMPIRIS, GARY A. JARVIS, and WALTER M. HOLLERAN.

MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, ABRAHAM A. SIMMONS, Assistant United States Attorney, Attorneys for Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 of the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, plaintiff Wei-Hsun Din, as Successor in Interest to Richard Din, Deceased, and as Successor in Interest to Rey-Kung Din, Deceased, on the one hand, and defendants, the Regents of the University of California (the "UC"), Harry Lampiris, Gary A. Jarvis, and Walter M. Holleran (collectively, the "Individual Defendants"), and the United States of America (the "USA"), on the other hand, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The defendants' Motions to Dismiss originally set for hearing on October 11, 2013, were continued to January 24, 2014, on the motion of the United States of America, in light of the government shutdown.

2. Counsel for plaintiff has a previously scheduled matter in the state court on January 24, 2014, and has requested that counsel for defendants stipulate to a short continuance of the January 24, 2014, hearing date.

3. The parties have therefore agreed, subject to the Court's approval, that the motions to dismiss now set for hearing on January 24, 2014, each be continued for hearing on January 31, 2014, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 11.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN,

It is so ordered. The motions to dismiss now set for hearing on January 24, 2014, are each be continued for hearing on February 21, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 11.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.