Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Nguyen

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

November 6, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
SON NGUYEN and HAI NGUYEN, Defendants.

Peter A. Leeming SBN 119124, Law Offices of Peter A. Leeming, PAUL B. MELTZER, Gary G. Fry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Santa Cruz, CA, Attorney for defendant HAI NGUYEN.

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

D. LOWELL JENSEN, District Judge.

The parties stipulate, and request that the court Order, the following:

1. This matter is currently set before the Court for a status conference on November 7, 2013 at 9:00 AM. Through this stipulation and proposed Order, the parties are jointly requesting that the status conference be continued to December 19, 2013, at 9:00 A.M.

2. Son Nguyen and Hai Nguyen are husband and wife. Mr. Son Nguyen was initially charged in a seven count indictment in May, 2013. Mr. Nguyen was the sole defendant in the initial indictment until a superseding indictment was filed on October 17, 2013. On October 22, 2013 Mrs. Hai Nguyen was arrested on the superseding indictment and appeared before Magistrate Judge Grewal for identification of counsel. The superseding indictment added an additional count (Count Eight) charging Mr. Son Nguyen and Mrs. Hai Nguyen with 18 U.S.C. Sect 1014, false statements to a bank. Attorney Peter Leeming was provisionally appointed to represent Mrs. Nguyen., and she was released on conditions following a detention hearing on October 24, 2013.

3. On October 28, 2013 both defendants appeared before Magistrate Judge Grewal. Mr. Paul Meltzer substituted as counsel for Mr. Son Nguyen, who was arraigned on the superseding indictment.

4. Thus, the status of the case is as follows. Both defendants have new counsel, and Mrs. Nguyen is new to the case. Neither defense counsel has yet had the opportunity to review the discovery in this matter.

5. For the above reasons, the parties respectfully request that the status conference date of November 7, 2013 be vacated, and a new status conference date be set for December 19, 2013, at 9:00 A.M, and that the time between October 28, 2013 and December 19, 2013 be excluded for the effective preparation of counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.