Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cooper v. Heatley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

November 6, 2013

GOLDYN COOPER, Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT HEATLEY, et al., Defendants.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Dr. Scott Heatley, Dr. H. Walter Pepper and Terri Weinholdt. On August 15, 2013, defendant H. Walter Pepper filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a cognizable claim against him. When plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition to the motion, the court ordered plaintiff to file his opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty days. (ECF No. 28.) Following plaintiff's September 30, 2013 request for an extension of time, the court again ordered plaintiff to file his opposition. (ECF No. 30.) On September 30, 2013 and October 17, 2013, plaintiff filed statements of non-opposition to defendant Pepper's motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 29 at 2 and 31.)

In light of plaintiff's statement of non-opposition to the granting of the pending motion, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. Defendant H. Walter Pepper's August 15, 2013 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) be granted;

2. Defendant H. Walter Pepper be dismissed from this action; and

3. This action shall proceed as to defendants Scott Heatley and Terry Weinholdt only.

These findings and recommendations are submitted too the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst , 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.