Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Albright

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 3, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
PATRICIA JANE ALBRIGHT, AND JORDAN ROBERT WIRTZ, Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, MICHAEL M. BECKWITH, Assistant United States Attorney, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, United States of America.

Kelly Babineau, Counsel for Defendant, Patricia Jane Albright.

John Manning, Counsel for Defendant, Jordan Robert Wirt.

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; AND ORDER

TORY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

STIPULATION

1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Motions Hearing on December 12, 2013.

2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue the Motions Hearing until December 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between December 12, 2013, and December 19, 2013, under Local Code T4 and E.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The parties desire additional time to prepare.
b. The parties believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
c. The government does not object to the continuance.
d. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
e. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of December 12, 2013 to December 19, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
f. Additionally, motions were filed by the defendants on September 14, 2013. As such, time should be excluded from September 14, 2013, to December 19, 2013 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D) [Local Code E).

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.