Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bodi v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 6, 2013

BETH A. BODI, Plaintiff,
v.
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS; SHINGLE SPRINGS TRIBAL HEALTH PROGRAM; SHINGLE SPRINGS TRIBAL HEALTH; BRENDA ADAMS (as current Chairperson of the Shingle Springs Tribal Health Board), and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, Defendants.

PAULA M. YOST (State Bar No. 156843) SANDRA R. McCANDLESS (State Bar No. 57740) IAN R. BARKER (State Bar No. 240223) DENTONS U.S. LLP San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants. SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS, SHINGLE SPRINGS TRIBAL HEALTH PROGRAM, SHINGLE SPRINGS TRIBAL HEALTH PROGRAM, and BRENDA ADAMS

PACIFIC AMERICAN LAW GROUP, PC Wendy L. Hillger Attorneys for Plaintiff.

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION ON THE BASIS OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Beth A. Bodi and defendants Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians, Shingle Springs Tribal Health Program, Shingle Springs Tribal Health Board, and Brenda Adams, by and through their counsel of record respectfully request that the court give effect to the stipulation regarding the briefing schedule for defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, as follows:

WHEREAS, defendants' reply brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is currently due December 9, 2013, and the Court has set the hearing for January 13, 2014;

WHEREAS, counsel for defendants has faced major discovery deadlines in two other matters that could not be continued past this week, as well as an unforeseen personal emergency this week;

WHEREAS, given the five-week interval between the current reply brief deadline and the hearing, defendants' deadline for the reply brief can be extended one week without prejudicing plaintiff or affecting any other deadlines or events in this case; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the foregoing reasons present good cause for altering the briefing schedule set forth in Rule 230 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the Parties that Defendants shall file any reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss no later than December 16, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Parties having stipulated thereto and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants shall file any reply brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint no later than December 16, 2013.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.