Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Mota

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 9, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
JONATHAN MOTA, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612), United States Attorney, J. DOUGLAS WILSON (DCBN 412811), Chief, Criminal Division, KATHRYN HAUN (DCBN 484141), WILLIAM FRENTZEN (LABN 24421), Assistant United States Attorneys, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for United States of America.

KATHRYN R. HAUN, Assistant U.S. Attorneys,

RICHARD MAZER, MARK GOLDROSEN, Attorneys for Defendant.

STIPULATION WITH RESPECT TO TRIAL AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

The parties appeared before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar on December 2, 2013 for a hearing to set dates. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kathryn Haun and William Frentzen represented the United States, and Richard B. Mazer, Esq. represented the defendant. The government requested a trial date in either February or March 2014. Among other reasons, the government stated that it was in the public's interest, including the victim's family's interest, to have as speedy a trial as possible. Defense counsel opposed the setting of a trial date in early 2014 due to commitments with other cases, including a case set for trial before Judge Illston in April and May 2014. The Court set forth several factors it typically considers in setting a trial date, and the parties agreed to meet and confer and see if they could arrive at a proposed schedule that would suit both sides.

The parties have met and conferred and have arrived at a proposed stipulated schedule for the following trial and pretrial dates. The following schedule presumes an October 6, 2014 trial date. Unless otherwise noted below, these deadlines are reciprocal and apply to each side.

August 1, 2014 Government produces materials necessary for defense reply to outstanding FRE 404(b) and severance motions

August 22, 2014 Defense files replies, if any, to government's previously-filed oppositions to defendant's Motion to Preclude FRE 404(b) Evidence and defendant's Motion to Sever

September 5, 2014 Deadline for filing any additional Motions in Limine

September 6, 2014 Case-in-chief disclosures for experts due

September 12, 2014 Deadline for filing any Oppositions to Motions in Limine

September 17, 2014 Deadline for filing any replies to Motions in Limine

September 19, 2014 Hearing date before the Court on defendant's Motion to Preclude FRE 404(b) Evidence and defendant's Motion to Sever, as well as Motions in Limine

September 26, 2014 Deadline for production of Jencks/Giglio materials that exist at the time and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.